Blog Article

Game-Based Assessments and Candidate Experience

Game-Based Assessments and Candidate Experience

Assessment science has come a long way in the last decade, and so has the emphasis on candidate experience. Game-based assessments have refreshed the pre-employment testing experience in recent years, aligning with the new-found focus on candidate engagement. But do candidates actually prefer game-based assessments to traditional testing methods? We decided to find out.

In Criteria’s 2022 Candidate Experience Report, we asked candidates how they felt about game-based assessments compared to the traditional question-and-answer format. From their responses, we gathered that, on average, candidates do prefer game-based assessments, with 26% of candidates strongly agreeing and 25% somewhat agreeing with that statement.

How Candidates Feel About Game-Based Assessments

When we dug deeper into the data, some interesting trends emerged around which demographics prefer game-based testing. One not-so-surprising finding was that younger job seekers – those 34 and under – were more likely to prefer them than older job seekers. 35% of under-25s preferred them, as did 30% of those in the 25-34 age group. As the age bracket increased, preference for game-based assessments dropped, with only 16% of job seekers in the 55+ preferring them. This makes sense – people typically favor things that they find familiar, with older generations feeling more comfortable with traditional methods of assessments compared to the more tech- and game-savvy younger generations.

Additionally, we found that candidates looking for work in particular industries made a difference in how they felt about game-based assessments. Candidates in Accounting/Finance (30%), Retail (34%), and Technology (35%) were the most likely to strongly agree that they preferred game-based tests. At the other end of the spectrum, candidates in the fields of Education (19%) and Government/Public Service (18%) were the least likely to prefer them.

Interestingly, we also found differences in preference for game-based assessments related to race and ethnicity. Asian (35%) and Black (27%) candidates were more likely to strongly agree that they favored game-based assessments, with White Candidates sharing this attitude the least at just 17%. This difference may stem from the notion that game-based assessments feel more fair to diverse candidates, as it’s well-documented that traditional testing formats put people of color at a disadvantage compared to their White peers.

Game-based assessments have lot of benefits. They are typically a quicker way to evaluate your talent pool while keeping candidates engaged and boosting your employer brand. Game-based assessments are just as effective at identifying candidates with the skills and abilities to succeed as traditional pre-employment tests. This makes them an excellent way to strike the balance between gathering objective and predictive data on candidate performance and creating a positive candidate experience.

So how can you know if game-based assessments are right for your hiring process? Like most things in life, the answer depends on a few factors. While game-based assessments won’t win over every candidate in every industry, they can help you create a more positive candidate experience, especially when you’re hiring for entry level roles.

To learn more about how candidates feel about the hiring process, download Criteria’s 2022 Candidate Experience Report today.

Related Articles

  • Young woman waving at computer screen in home office

    How Do Candidates Want to Interview in 2024?

    Read More
  • Woman sitting in front of a laptop at the office

    How to Deliver Candidate Rejection

    Read More
  • Storytelling to Humanize Auto Recruitment

    Using Storytelling to Humanize Automated Recruitment

    Read More